Medicine
These days many doctors very often do not treat people, but rather cripple them, relieving patients of the consequences (all serious ailments and diseases not related to mechanical injuries, these are the consequences of some karmic causes, “right” or “wrong” actions of a person in this or his past lives).
It is my deep conviction that a good doctor should seek out, investigate, and eliminate the root cause of disease, rather than its superficial manifestations in the form of various ailments or physical or mental disorders. That is, ideally, it would be necessary to radically change the paradigm of modern medicine, completely restructuring it to meet human needs. With an individual approach to each patient, taking into account not only the psychophysiological characteristics of the patient, but also their habits, life experience, and other factors that would help to reveal the entire “picture of the disease” as deeply and fully as possible, and most importantly, to understand the root cause of its origin.
At the same time, a prerequisite must be adherence to morality and, I would say, purity in the approach to each patient. Accordingly, this would imply a high level of spiritual and moral development on the part of the doctor first and foremost (and only then his professional qualifications), essentially equating him with a true healer or folk healer — in the best and most positive sense of these terms. Then the doctor would work not only with the physical manifestations of the patient’s illnesses and various ailments, but also with their subtle energies: it has long been known that illness first arises on a “subtle” level and only then moves to the physical level visible to most people. Naturally, this would place an additional burden of responsibility on the doctor, especially if they are a young specialist.
The unwillingness to put people on first place, above all other issues (more important than money, experiments on health, medical bureaucracy, incorrect diagnoses, endless reports to superiors, etc.), plus the inability to look into the essence of what is actually a disease, rather than its consequences, which is what modern medical science is actually engaged in all its diversity. In my opinion, this is the root of the problems associated with today’s medicine and healthcare in general.
Second point: the healthcare system has always been, is, and, unfortunately, will continue to be incredibly distant from ordinary people and their needs. After all, it is not concerned with the health of the population, but with the question of how best and most profitably to redistribute the financial flows coming from the state and various funds. After all, health, or rather the lack thereof in patients, has long been big business for the multi-level monster that is today’s state and its main controller in the healthcare sector — the relevant ministry, together with its branches and divisions throughout the country.
Another major and very serious problem cannot be ignored here: medical errors. No one is immune to them. They can happen anywhere, anytime, and to anyone. Whether in an abandoned hospital somewhere in a remote village or in a state-of-the-art clinic in the center of a huge metropolis.
In light of the above, a fair question arises: why should we actually entrust our health (and sometimes our lives) to “agents in white coats”? Why should a person allow their health to deteriorate to such an extent that they are no longer able to help themselves and are forced to turn to a place where the mothball- and alcohol-scented “ghost” of the Hippocratic oath reigns supreme and people with syringes in their hands scurry about everywhere: they have smiling faces, but at the same time evil and cunning eyes. It’s as if they know something that we don’t.
Modern medicine does not take into account the specifics of each particular case of illness (which is extremely desirable for successful diagnosis and subsequent treatment), using the “conveyor belt principle” when dealing with patients: when the next test subject enters the office (which is how, as a rule, “agents in white coats” perceive us), the doctor’s duty is to say a few traditional phrases, pretend to examine the patient, and at the end concoct a standard bureaucratic formality — a prescription or a referral to another authority. That is, to the next “theater of the absurd,” where the algorithm of action will be roughly the same, only the scenery will change slightly.
Another striking example of excess is so-called “black transplantology,” when hundreds and thousands of people around the world are kidnapped and then killed for the sake of selling their organs. Any healthy person, even a child, can become an unwitting donor in this field. All this is terrible and should not happen in a normal society.
Nevertheless, traditional medicine has its positive aspects. One of them (and the most effective, in my opinion) is so-called “primary medicine.” This includes traumatology, surgery, primary health care, emergency medical care for people in remote areas, etc. Undoubtedly, this branch of healthcare should remain an integral part of medicine both today and in the foreseeable future. I would also not discount obstetrics and gynecology, primary care by psychologists in accidents, terrorist attacks, and other non-standard, stressful situations, and perhaps pediatric medicine: but in a more developed and perfected form than the latter exists today.
Other areas of healthcare (in their traditional form) must be completely abolished or radically transformed, which is essentially the same thing. This includes the pharmaceutical industry with its billions in turnover and very strong government lobby. Not only are drugs harmful or simply useless for the human body (although pills may indeed can help), but the patient then becomes more and more dependent on them and over time buys more and more, ultimately spending most of their savings on drugs alone.
In other areas of medicine that are not related to primary care, it would be sufficient to combine three factors: the desire to help people, moral and spiritual education, and constant practice and improvement of one’s skills within the chosen specialization. The emphasis should be placed on the practical and moral aspects, rather than on diplomas and seniority.
The three pillars of the modern medicine
1) Ignorance
Ignorance lies in the fact that, in the frantic pace of modern life, people completely forget about their health, about the fact that the body is the “temple of the spirit” and that it needs to be cared for constantly: 24 hours a day, seven days a week. There is also blind faith in doctors and in the belief that if something happens, the people in white coats will definitely help, advise, and tell you what to do next.
2) Laziness
Here, it is simply a matter of apathy and unwillingness to change anything in one’s life. More precisely, it is the lack of motivation to take any action. “As long as everything works, no one thinks about how it all works” (quote from Advisor Hammond from The Matrix – author). People only start to take action when the “mechanism” breaks down andconsequences arise that are inevitable in the absence of preventive methods (disease prevention), as well as proper control and care of the complex bioenergetic machine that is undoubtedly the human body.
3) Lack of spiritual and moral guidance
The third “pillar” or principle on which modern medicine is based is the lack of harmony in human interaction with the surrounding world. Poor ecology, countless stresses, irregular eating habits, Poor ecology, countless stresses, irregular nutrition, an incorrect attitude towards life— all this ultimately leads to various diseases and disturbances in the normal, habitual rhythm of human life. This is without taking into account various karmic causes, as well as the genetic predisposition of individuals to certain ailments.
I want to emphasize that I am not talking here about self-medication or completely refusing medical services. Rather, I am saying about the prevention and avoidance of diseases. And disease prevention is a very important, fundamental thing. After all, you must agree that it is one thing to treat an existing disease and its symptoms, and quite another to prevent the potential onset of illness by nipping it in the bud or preventing even the slightest possibility of its occurrence.
One way to effectively combat disease is to lead a healthy lifestyle. That is, to eat right, think positively, engage in various spiritual practices (yoga, qigong, ancient Chinese and Tibetan medicine, various breathing techniques, prayer, meditation, etc.) that help energy circulate better in the body without causing stagnation or so-called “energy clots,” which are the main causes of a wide variety of diseases. Right thoughts, psychological stability, exercise, and a balanced diet are just a few elements, but together they can become a serious barrier to the onset of disease. Even if you can’t manage to do all of the above, there are one or two items on the list that everyone can do: whether at home, at work, or on the road.
Traditional and alternative medicine
Medicine and everything related to it, as we have already seen, is inseparable from the Matrix. But when I write this statement, I am referring primarily to traditional medicine and its constituent elements. When it comes to non traditional aspects, things get much more interesting. Alternative medicine (which, in my opinion, is less a product of the System than its “traditional” counterpart) is a fairly broad and, at the same time, virtually unexplored area of healthcare. However, it is undoubtedly very promising. After all, it includes everything that traditional medicine lacks: for example, “non-traditional” medicine emphasizes a comprehensive approach to health. There is also no tendency towards specialization, which is characteristic of traditional treatment.
If these two opposing methods of treatment (traditional and alternative medicine) were to face off against each other, it wouldn’t even be a battle between Fiat and Mercedes. The enormous gap in the range of possibilities (both potential and those that can already be felt and “touched”) can only be compared to a person who is just learning to read and count and someone who can already independently design engines for rocket carriers or develop artificial intelligence. In addition, alternative medicine pays a lot of attention to prevention. Traditional medicine intervenes when the disease has already manifested itself; non-traditional medicine is aimed at preventing illness.
Among the disadvantages of alternative medicine, it is worth noting the very limited amount of information available about certain treatment methods. Also, it is important to remember that many components of alternative medicine (such as herbs or ointments) may be incompatible with each other, toxic, or even
have rather unpleasant side effects after use.
Another important point: one shouldn’t forget that the marketing strategy of some companies and medical centers practicing alternative methods of treatment is often confusing. “The words ‘natural’ and ‘safe’ are easy to confuse, but they are not synonymous, despite the fact that we are often led to believe otherwise. Many dietary supplements and herbal teas are deliberately and incorrectly labeled as natural by the manufacturer, and this should be taken into account. If a manufacturer claims that a product contains certain secret ingredients or promises a miraculous cure for a whole range of diseases, such a product should definitely not be trusted” (quote from medpulse.ru).
The “placebo effect” can be considered a bridge or transitional stage between traditional and non-traditional medicine. It is quite widely used in traditional methods of treating patients, but the effect itself, and most importantly, how it is applied to patients, is very unusual and non-traditional in nature. Despite all its ambiguity and, in a sense, exoticism, the “placebo effect” serves as a vivid example of how traditional medicine can sometimes deviate from the standards imposed by the system and boldly experiment in unfamiliar territory.
Medicine in the Future
Let’s try to imagine another picture: namely, what the medical professions and medicine itself will be like in the not too distant future (if healthcare does not move to “alternative track” in the near future, which, of course, is unlikely, given the trends). Let’s say in 2030.
It is a wide range: from organ developers to telesurgery experts and cryopreservation specialists. I offer you the entire list in the original, in the form in which it is presented on the site:
1) “Mechanic for companion robots.” Companion robots will accompany people in old age: they will help them with household chores, make it easier to move around the house, monitor medication and entertain with conversations. If the android breaks down, the owner can call a mechanic who understands this particular type of robot. You can invite a specialist at any time of the day or night.
2) “Deep Learning Expert”. Algorithms will not only help doctors make decisions, but will also take on the tasks of organizing all workflows. In the future, experts will be needed to teach algorithms new skills. They will be the ones who will “feed” the neural networks with data for training and monitor the results.
3) “Developers of AI chatbots”. Medical chatbots (or virtual interlocutors) are already consulting patients around the world, and over time they will be available on every smartphone. During a migraine attack, the patient will turn to the bot, which will find the cause of the ailment and suggest a suitable treatment method.
4) “Lifestyle strategist”. By 2045, 245 million wearable devices will be sold worldwide. But who will select them for users and monitor the results? Lifestyle strategists will create individual programs with a daily routine for their clients, as well as help with the choice of wearable gadgets and give advice on health insurance.
5) “Telesurgery”. By 2020, sales of robot surgeons will double and amount to 6.4 billion dollars. Robots will not be able to work on their own – their activities will be monitored by supervising surgeons. Courses on telesurgery and robotic surgery will appear in the world’s leading universities, and the accuracy of surgical operations will improve by orders of magnitude.
6) “Lobbyist of robot surgeons”. Lobbyists will promote robotics in medical institutions, proving its benefits and effectiveness. They will be particularly active in the event of a medical error. Lobbyists use these cases to their advantage to prove the superiority of robots over humans.
7) “Route planners for medical drones.” Experts will be involved in drawing up optimal routes for the delivery of medicines, medical equipment, donor blood and organs to patients in remote regions of the planet. This work will require engineering and topographical knowledge.
8) “Driverless cars mechanic”. Driverless cars will become not just a vehicle, but assistants who monitor the condition of their owner. Robot cars equipped with biometric sensors will analyze the condition of a person and inform him about the problems detected. Mercedes-Benz cars have already learned to recognize signs of fatigue in the driver. And this is just the beginning. Over time, the company promises to introduce biometric sensors in seat belts and steering wheels. However, like any other electronics, such sensors will occasionally fail and professional robot mechanics will be able to restore their operation.
9) “Cryopreservation specialist”. Modern technologies allow the preservation of the human body after death, and some scientists even believe that over time the body can be brought back to life (I will leave this without comment – Yu.S.). In Michigan, USA, there is the Institute of Cryonics, where bodies are stored at minus 196 degrees Celsius. Cryopreservation can also be used to help patients who have suffered gunshot wounds or been injured in a car accident.
10) “Organ developer”. The main hope of transplantology is to create organs from the patient’s stem cells. The technique solves several problems at once, the main one being the acute shortage of donor organs. Those with knowledge in the field of molecular biology, 3-D printing and medicine will be able to design and develop organs for their further transplantation.
Conclusion
Among the ten points listed, there are both positive and negative aspects. To these can be added a couple more of absolutely useless ones. Pros: reducing the percentage of medical errors, solving the problem of the shortage of donor organs and the delivery of the necessary equipment to remote and inaccessible regions. And one (but very big and “fat”) minus: robot medicine of the future still does not solve the main problem – it does not cure a person, but only cosmetically improves the methods of today’s traditional medicine, introducing more and more new treatment technologies to prolong human existence in the Matrix.
That is, there is no qualitative leap here, not even close. You can treat a person over the Internet with the same success. The result: over the years, medicine has acquired more and more impressive forms, but in no way, however, has it changed the quality of its content and the services it provides. This is its most serious flaw and therefore modern medicine, instead of actually helping and serving people, still continues to be an organic element of the System, although at first glance it may not look like it.
The Book of Your Life
“Stepping outside the System is not an open, destructive war. It is the creation of an underground, far-reaching network of free people united by a single noble goal.”